Den här grundliga genomgången av det stora slaget i Rohan var mycket läsvärd, tycker jag! Trevligt när en militärstrateg har så pass bra koll på det tolkienska källmaterialet också, och
mycket trevligt med en så tydlig distinktion mellan bok och film. Jag har bara läst del ett ännu, om upprinnelsen till slaget och Sarumans stora misstag, men jag tror nog att jag vågar rekommendera resten av serien också.
https://acoup.blog/2020/05/01/collectio ... elms-gate/https://acoup.blog/2020/05/08/collectio ... otal-warg/https://acoup.blog/2020/05/15/collectio ... f-saruman/https://acoup.blog/2020/05/22/collectio ... -of-rohan/Citera:
But as to Saruman – there is no hint in the Silmarilion that Curumo (the Maia who would be Saruman) was a great warrior among the Maiar (indeed, I cannot find that he did any war-fighting before this; his Maia name comes from the Unfinished Tales – he does not appear in the Silmarilion save as a wizard); he was a Maia of Aulë the Smithlord, and it shows. Saruman is an builder, engineer, plotter and tinkerer. Given his personality, he strikes me as exactly the sort of very intelligent person whose assumes that their mastery of one field (effectively science-and-engineering, along with magic-and-persuasion, in this case) makes them equally able to perform in other, completely unrelated fields (a mistake common to very many very smart people, but – it seems to me, though this may be only because I work in the humanities – peculiarly common to those moving from the STEM fields to more humanistic ones, as Saruman is here). I immediately feel I understand Saruman sense of “I am very smart and these idiots in Rohan can command armies, so how hard can it be?” And so I love that this overconfidence leads him to man-handle his army into a series of quite frankly rookie mistakes. After all, the core of his character arc is that Saruman was never so wise or clever as he thought himself to be.